| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
____________________________________________
Athens, Ga. – The nation's shortage of primary care physicians has been linked to a host of poor health outcomes, and a new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggests that salary disparities play a major role in the shortage.
Dr. Mark Ebell, a professor and assistant to the provost at the University of Georgia, compared 2007 starting salary data for various physician specialties with the percentage of medical school graduates choosing those specialties. He found a strong, direct correlation between salary and the popularity of a specialty.
"Countries with the healthiest primary care systems tend to have the best health outcomes," Ebell said. "We rank behind many countries in the quality and efficiency of health care, and I think a lot of that is because we have neglected primary care."
Among his findings:
Family medicine had the lowest average salary ($185,740) and the lowest percentage of filled residency positions among U.S. graduates (42 percent). Radiologists and orthopedic surgeons, who had an average salary of more than $400,000, had the highest percentage of filled residency positions among U.S. graduates (88.7 percent and 93.8 percent, respectively).
The link between average salary and the popularity of a specialty is not surprising, particularly to Ebell. He conducted a similar study nearly 20 years ago and found the same relationship. Since then, however, the salary disparities have grown and the shortage of primary care physicians—which includes those who specialize in family medicine, pediatrics or general internal medicine—has become more pronounced. In the past decade alone, for example, the number of U.S. medical school graduates entering family practice residencies has dropped by 50 percent. Studies have linked a lower percentage of primary care physicians with higher infant mortality rates, higher overall death rates and more deaths from heart disease and cancer.
Ebell said he conducted the study to draw renewed attention to the role of salary disparities in the primary care shortage and to encourage policymakers to enact meaningful reforms to increase the percentage of primary care physicians.
"The problem of salary disparities is not something that anyone is going to solve locally," Ebell said. "This is something that will require reform at a national level."
He said one possible reform is expanded debt relief for students who choose primary care practices and in particular those who choose to practice in underserved areas. He notes that the average debt for a medical school graduate has quadrupled—from $35,000 to $140,000—in the nearly 20 years since his original study. When students graduate with the equivalent of a mortgage in debt, he said, they can't help but be drawn to high-paying specialties rather than primary care.
Changes to insurance reimbursements, which currently hurt primary care by rewarding the delivery of diagnostic tests and medical treatments over time spent communicating with patients, are also needed to reduce salary disparities, he said, and have the potential to improve quality of care by reducing unnecessary or duplicative interventions.
Ebell said the broad knowledge base of primary care can be intimidating to students, so creating information technology systems to manage information will be important. Exposing students to primary care physician role models is another way to sustain interest in primary care throughout a student's training.
"A career in primary care can be very rewarding," Ebell said, "and mentors can show students the satisfaction that comes from building relationships over time with patients."
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Only 23 percent of U.S. medical students plan to practice internal medicine and just 2 percent intend to become general practitioners, leading to a possible healthcare crisis, researchers reported on Tuesday.
Students are especially worried about caring for elderly patients with complicated diseases, and are being scared away from becoming the kind of general practitioners that will be most needed in the future, the researchers reported.
The students complained that internal medicine required more paperwork, a greater breadth of knowledge and would pay less than more lucrative specialties.
This could lead to a crisis in healthcare, Dr. Karen Hauer of the University of California, San Francisco, and colleagues reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
"The number of older adults in the United States is expected to nearly double between the years 2005 and 2030, and one planning model predicts that the United States will have 200,000 too few physicians by 2020," they wrote.
"Students were dissuaded from internal medicine by their experiences with elderly and chronically ill patients," they added. "Other studies have shown that students' attitudes about caring for elderly and chronically ill patients decline during training."
They polled 1,177 medical students, and found 23 percent planned careers in internal medicine, with just 24 planning to go into general internal medicine.
"Our large sample of U.S. medical students expressed reservations about careers in internal medicine because of patient complexity, the practice environment and the lifestyle compared with other specialties," the researchers wrote.
Perhaps a course in emotional intelligence might help, suggested Daisy Grewal and Heather Davidson of Stanford University in California.
Training in emotional intelligence -- the ability to detect and manage one's own and other people's emotions -- might make for better and happier doctors all around, they wrote in a commentary in the journal.
"Given the importance of interpersonal and communication skills in a variety of outcomes, understanding the skills underlying emotional intelligence competencies is increasingly important," they wrote.
"Emotional intelligence is a concept worth further exploration in medical education and may be one of several important theories that help move the culture of medical education ahead by creating a better learning, working, and caring environment."
(Reporting by Maggie Fox; editing by Julie Steenhuysen)
固定リンク | コメント (2) | トラックバック (11)
| 日 | 月 | 火 | 水 | 木 | 金 | 土 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
コメント
コメント一覧
原文ありがとうございました。年収だけではないとは思いたいですが、やはり経済的なインセンティブのかわりに何かがないと、選ぶ仕方ないと思ってしまいます。
自分もJAMAの文献をもっと読もうと思います。
コメントありがとうございました。こちらでは、一般の新聞の第一面で、紹介していました。これからのベービーブマーが主治医不足になるという深刻な問題点です。
記事を書いている時に、先生の記事にきずき驚きました。「さすがSky Team先生だ。多くの医学誌を読んでおられる。」とびっくりしました。2007年の初任給は、USA TODAYの第一面に掲載されていました。
>年収だけではないとは思いたいですが、やはり経済的なインセンティブのかわりに何かがないと、選ぶ仕方ないと思ってしまいます。
年収だけでは無いですが、記事に書かれているように、医学生は,QOL(QUALITY OF LIFE)を最重要視しています。ひとりあたり、2000万円の負債をかかえているからです。ではまた。
コメントを書く